Skip to content
ThetaLayer

Mandate · Ledger · Scorecard · Lifecycle

The accountability plane for AI agents

ThetaLayer gives every AI agent in your enterprise a mandate, a ledger and a scorecard — across every vendor and every system of record. See what each agent did, what it cost, and whether it was worth it.

Agents · what they claim
In-house agents
Orchestrators · OTel
Vendor agent platforms
Copilots · Agentforce
Coding agents
Claude Code · Cursor
Sub-agents
Delegated runs
ThetaLayer
Accountability plane
Mandate
Ledger
Scorecard
Lifecycle
ERP
CRM
HRIS
Email
Spreadsheets
Approvals
Systems of record · what changed
(Every action claimed. Every change evidenced. Every euro attributed.)

The gap

AI agents now spend real money. Almost nobody can say what they did.

Agents act across email, spreadsheets, CRM and systems of record. The ERP doesn't know an agent was involved; the agent runtime doesn't know what actually changed. You are paying for a digital workforce you can't yet manage.

37%

of organizations see any EBIT impact from AI — flat on 2025

McKinsey, The state of AI in 2026

1 in 5

already limit AI use because of token and running costs

McKinsey, The state of AI in 2026

21%

have a mature governance model for autonomous agents

Deloitte, State of AI in the Enterprise 2026

76%

now have a Chief AI Officer — the owner of AI returns

IBM Institute for Business Value, CEO Study 2026

One plane · four pillars

Manage agents like a workforce — across every platform

A job description, a timesheet, a performance review and an HR record for every agent. One plane above all your agent vendors, anchored in the systems of record below them.

Pillar 01 · Mandate

A job description every agent can be held to

Define what each agent may do — tools, data, amount thresholds, spend caps, autonomy level and identity rules. Mandates are versioned, and every change is re-checked against the agent's full history, so you see the impact of a rule before anyone enforces it.

  • Approval thresholds and sensitive-field rules
  • Per-run and monthly spend caps
  • Autonomy levels earned on track record
Mandate · AP Intake Agent
v1 · L3 act within limits
  • Allowed tools
    9 tools
    100% pass
  • Approval above
    > €10,000
    4 failed
  • Bank details need approval
    bank_account
    3 failed
  • Spend cap per run
    €2.50
    22 failed
  • Acts under own identity
    required
    pass
Edit a rule and every historical run is re-checked against the new version.
Illustrative · demo environment, simulated data

Pillar 02 · Ledger

What each agent actually did — on both sides of the record

Every run is reconstructed end to end: the trigger, each tool call, the approvals, the payment. Each action an agent claims is matched to independent evidence in the system of record, with an explicit link method and confidence. Gaps and contradictions become exceptions, not footnotes.

  • Runtime claims vs. system-of-record changes
  • Identity of the agent, the person and the credential used
  • Late evidence — approvals, payments — linked automatically
Ledger
One run · every system
  • 07:49:23Logged invoice in AP tracker · AgentConfirmed
  • 07:49:26Supplier email opened · Mailbox auditRecord
  • 07:49:58Posted invoice to ERP · AgentContradicted
  • 11:20:04Approved bank change · ApproverPerson
  • Tue 06:00Invoice paid · ERP paymentsRecord
Illustrative · demo environment, simulated data

Pillar 03 · Scorecard

Cost per outcome, comparable across every vendor

Measure what each agent produced for what it cost — cost per completed workflow, straight-through and takeover rates, evidence coverage and mandate compliance — by agent, version, team and task type. Every metric is defined, versioned and traceable to its source records.

  • Version regressions caught in days, not quarters
  • Routing decisions per task type, not per vendor
  • Allocated platform fees labeled as allocated
Scorecard
Cost per completed invoice · weekly
Cost / completed
€1.22
Straight-through
79%
Evidence coverage
99.7%
v2.4.0
AP agent · DACHAP agent · Benelux
€0.70 → €2.40 per completed invoice after v2.4.0 shipped. Staying on v2.3.0 would have cost ~€406 less.
Illustrative · demo environment, simulated data

Pillar 04 · Lifecycle

An owner, a review date and a decision

Treat agents like a workforce. Each agent has a named owner, an autonomy level and a quarterly review backed by its scorecard and exception history — so renewal, re-scoping and retirement are decisions, not defaults.

  • Named owners and review cadences
  • Autonomy raised or lowered on evidence
  • Retire agents that don't earn their cost
Lifecycle · Vendor Master Data Agent
Owner: Vendor Master Data Steward
Version
1.1.0
Autonomy
L2 · approval
Next review
15 Jan
Quarterly review decision
Renew
Re-scope
Retire
Illustrative · demo environment, simulated data

Two-sided evidence

An agent's log is a claim. The system of record is the evidence.

ThetaLayer matches every action an agent reports against what the ERP, CRM, HRIS, mailbox or approvals system actually recorded. When they disagree — a timeout that really posted, a success that never landed, a change nobody's agent made — you see it, with the evidence attached.

Direct reference
95%
The agent returned the record's ID
Business key
85%
Hashed vendor + invoice number
Time window
70%
Identity and timing only

Every link carries its method and confidence. Uncertainty is shown, never hidden.

Evidence chain
Invoice €4,312.50 · AP agent
Posted invoice to ERP
Agent reported
timeout
→
ERP change log says
invoice posted NL01-5200004276 +2.4s
ContradictedLinked by business key · 50%
Posted invoice to ERP · retry
Agent reported
success
→
ERP change log says
invoice posted NL01-5200004277 +2.3s
ConfirmedLinked by business key · 75%
Same supplier invoice posted twice — both paid
Duplicate posting · high severity · routed to AP owner for review
Illustrative · demo environment, simulated data

What you can decide

Every agent decision, backed by cost per outcome

Built around the decisions a Chief AI Officer and CFO actually make — not around dashboards.

Spend

  • Route each task to the cheapest agent that does it well
  • Set spend caps and charge costs back to teams
Metric
Cost per completed workflow, by team and tool

Value

  • Scale, renew or retire each agent at quarterly review
  • Decide build vs. buy on measured cost per outcome
Metric
Output per euro of agent spend

Control

  • Raise or lower each agent's autonomy on its track record
  • Export evidence for internal audit, DORA and the EU AI Act
Metric
Share of agent actions within mandate

Leaders already measure this: more than 60% of “future-built” companies rigorously track AI value, against 17% of stagnating ones. — BCG, The Widening AI Value Gap (Sep 2025)

Your data stays yours

Read-only. Minimized. Runs where your data lives.

Credentials and raw records never leave your network. Only minimized, schema-validated evidence reaches the control plane.

Security & trust
Customer-side collector

Runs in your environment with read-only access to agent runtimes and audit logs. Your credentials stay with you.

Minimized by design

IBANs, invoice numbers and message IDs are hashed; email bodies, subjects and cell values are dropped before export.

EU-hosted control plane

Frankfurt by default, with tenant isolation at every layer. Other regions on request.

Detection before enforcement

Start read-only. Add enforcement only at the tool boundaries you choose, when you're ready.

Sits alongside, not instead of

Neutral by design

Vendor control planes govern agents best inside their own ecosystems. Security tools protect the perimeter. ThetaLayer owns the link between what an agent costs and what it produces — across all of them.

Vendor control planes

Microsoft Agent 365, ServiceNow AI Control Tower and platform consoles catalog and control agents inside their ecosystems.

We read across them and reconcile against your systems of record.
AI security tools

Protect against prompt injection, data leakage and risky permissions — and sell to the CISO.

We answer the CFO's and CAIO's question: was it worth it, and did it stay in mandate?
Observability & APM

Trace latency, errors and token usage inside one application.

We follow the business outcome across systems: posted, approved, paid.

The pilot

Six weeks. Read-only. Success criteria agreed up front.

One workflow, one agent runtime, two or three systems of record. No changes to your agents.

Week 0
Connect
Read-only access to one agent runtime and its systems of record.
Week 2
Baseline
Every run reconstructed; cost per completed workflow and evidence coverage.
Week 4
Mandates
Draft mandates re-checked against history; top exceptions reviewed with owners.
Week 6
Decide
Routing, cap and control plan with projected savings — then go or no-go.

Book a Demo

See your agents through one plane.

Book a 30-minute walkthrough. We'll reconstruct a real workflow end to end — mandates, evidence and cost per outcome — and scope a six-week, read-only pilot around your agents.